There was a lot of enthusiasm earlier this month when President Obama announced the ConnectED initiative to bring high speed Internet access to 99% of our nation’s students. The President set an initial target of at least 100 Mbps of connectivity per 1,000 students, with an ultimate goal of 1,000 Mbps (1 Gbps) per 1,000 students. But what will it take to implement the President’s vision?

REFORMING THE E-RATE PROGRAM

As researched and documented by the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), in its Broadband Imperative white paper, the need to connect students is being driven by many factors, including new online instructional resources, online assessments, one-to-one computing initiatives, students’ wi-fi enabled devices, and so forth. The President, in his ConnectED announcement, affirmed what SETDA and others have been saying for a while: it is time to get our schools off the digital driveway and onto the digital highway. It is time to deploy faster data connections to our classrooms and ensure that high-speed Internet for students is the norm, not the exception.

The President has called on the FCC to update and expand the E-rate funding program in order to help fuel higher speed student connections. Funds For Learning® estimates that E-rate applicants account for about 98% of all K-12 students (excluding home schooled students). Studying E-rate application data provides a wealth of information about the number of school and library buildings to be connected and the number of students to be served. Current E-rate discount rates and funding requests provide a baseline for existing demand for telecomm and Internet connectivity. Combining this information, it is possible to estimate, using very broad strokes, the resources required to implement the President’s plan.

Current Telecommunication and Internet Demand

In FY2013, applicants applied for E-rate support at 146,767 schools and library buildings in the United States.

The schools serve a total reported population of 52.4 million students with a median enrollment of 373 students per school building.

Connecting all of those buildings is not inexpensive. For the funding year starting July 1, 2013, E‑rate applicants reported total annual telecommunications and Internet expenses of $3.63 billion, for which they requested $2.72 billion in E-rate discounts.

On average, schools reported annual connectivity expenses of $23,368 per building, or $60.54 per student. Libraries reported annual connectivity expenses of $11,838 per building. We can expect that these numbers will increase significantly in the near future.

Current Network Infrastructure (Internal Connections) Demand

E-rate applications also provide clues about the cost of providing high-speed connections to our students using “internal connections,” on-campus infrastructure such as wired or wireless computer networks. But these “cost clues” for internal connections are not as easy to decipher as they are for telecommunications and Internet access. Current FCC “priority” rules discourage schools from requesting internal connections by giving preferential treatment to telecommunications and Internet service requests -even though these services are not always the most cost-effective approach to getting students online.

As a result, the majority of the current 25,991 applicants do not even bother submitting requests for E-rate discounts on internal connections. For the funding year starting July 1, 2013, 5,364 applicants did submit funding requests for internal connections.

Forecasting Broadband Need

The table below shows the estimated cost of providing a 100 Mbps or 1 Gbps connection to each of these buildings. The estimate shows the annual cost over a range of monthly expenses. For example, if every school and library building in the United States received a 100 Mbps broadband connection for $1,500 a month, the total annual expense for this service would be $3,184,200,000. Based on current E‑rate discount rates, the total E-rate demand for this service would be $2,300,041,800, or $40.82 per student.

The analysis assumes a $2,000 or $4,000 one-time setup fee for 100 Mbps or 1 Gbps broadband, respectively. Also, to account for their unusually high service costs, the annual expense is doubled for school sites designated as “Rural Remote” by the Department of Education.

Forecasting Internal Connections Need

The table below shows the estimated cost of providing additional internal connections infrastructure at each school and library building. It is assumed that no E-rate funding is available for administrative buildings.


The expense per building is based on the FY2013 average expenses per building for internal connections as reported by applicants. The E-rate funding requests are calculated using each building’s current E-rate discount rate. It is also assumed that Pre-K facilities and administrative buildings will have average internal connections costs similar to existing library infrastructure projects.

$6.8 Billion? Estimating the Impact on the E-rate program

Based on this data and other Funds For Learning® analysis, it appears that $125/student for schools and $21,576 per library will yield an adequate annual E-rate budget to provide 100 Mbps connections to each student and library patron.

For schools, the average cost per student is based on the following:

For libraries, the average cost per building is based on the following:

Summary

The President’s ConnectED initiative has the potential to positively impact every student and library patron in the United States. The reform required – and the limited resources available – to achieve this outcome necessitate careful planning and efficient use of resources.

Funds For Learning® has submitted a proposal to the FCC that provides a framework for the type of reform that is necessary. The Funds For Learning® E-rate 2.0 proposal:

  • Offers E-rate applicants an incentive to procure the most effective technology solutions, seek lower prices and submit accurate funding requests.
  • Encourages applicants to make the best use of their existing resources. If a school district already has a wide area network, it can choose to focus its E-rate discounts on wiring schools, or vice-versa.
  • Avoids “one size fits all” regulations by providing flexibility and more local decision making.
  • Allows for the expansion of the existing E-rate eligible services. For example, bandwidth optimizers and network caching devices – devices that lower monthly recurring costs – could be added to the list of supported products.
  • Accommodates varying levels of funding. If the E-rate funding cap increases, all applicants benefit proportionate to their E-rate discount rate.

These changes come about via one simple change to the existing program: a common sense limit on the amount of discounts any one applicant can request in a given year. This approach was first identified by the 2003 E-rate Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Task Force. At a time when every dollar needs to be used to its fullest potential, this simple change will protect the E-rate program for years to come and will ensure that the additional money the President has requested the FCC to provide to schools and libraries be used in the most efficient and effective manner possible to impact our communities.

Visit http://www.fundsforlearning.com/FFLProposal.php or email reform@fundsforlearning.com to learn more about this proposal and how it will support the President’s ConnectED initiative.