Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

FY 2014 Demand Analysis: Part 3 – Impact of Size on P1 Expenses

On May 16, 2014, Funds For Learning® submitted our FY 2014 P1 Demand Analysis to the FCC, a report on current school spending for telecommunications services and Internet access. Our analysis was designed to help answer two fundamental questions:

  1. What do schools spend each year on telecommunications and Internet access?
  2. What drives cost variations between schools?

E-rate funding applications provide a clear window into school spending. But discovering the underlying factors that influence costs is a much harder question to answer. Over the course of the next month, Funds For Learning® will begin to tackle the questions above via a four-part series that dives deeper into our analysis, shedding light on the data and debunking several E-rate myths along the way.

Part 3 – Impact of Applicant Size on P1 Expenses

The larger the applicant, the less they pay for telecommunications and Internet access. That is the clear message that emerges from the E-rate funding requests submitted by schools in 2014. Single-site schools, such as public charter and private religious schools, pay out-of-pocket expenses that average $1.79 per student each month. At the other extreme, large school districts with more than 50,000 students pay just $0.75 per student each month, almost 60% less.

 Monthyl School P1 Per Student - by size of school

Applicant size is by far the strongest predictor of what a school will pay out-of-pocket each month for telecommunications and Internet access; discount rates are the second largest contributor to variations in expenditures; and, of the three factors in this analysis, applicant location has the least significant impact on what schools pay each month.

 Average Monthly Out-of-Pocket P1 Per Student

NOTE: These charts do not include the data for New York City Board of Education or Remote Rural Alaska schools.


Scale certainly has a significant effect when it comes the price of telecommunications and Internet access. Having more sites allows for fixed costs to be distributed more broadly, and often brings along with it lower per unit prices. Since its inception, the E-rate program has supported large E-rate applicants, including consortium based on the notion that larger sized applicants can command more cost-effective services. The data from the FY2014 school applications certainly supports this hypothesis.


Next Week: Part 4 of our analysis will look at the combined impact of school size, discount rate and location on the telecommunications and Internet access services requested by schools in 2014.

question icon

We’re here to help!

Our mission is to provide high-quality consulting and support services for the needs of E-rate program participants. We consult with applicants to help them understand, effectively utilize, and maintain compliance with E-rate rules and regulations. We help prepare and submit paperwork, and interact with program administrators on our clients’ behalf.

Request a Consultation