Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Consolidated Budgets Could Really Help

The Category Two budget system has provided more than $4.35 billion of E-rate support to schools and libraries since 2015. As the FCC is considering improvements to the system, one key factor is the number of school and library sites who “maxed out” their C2 budget. These sites needed additional support than was available to them. Funds For Learning estimates that there were 37,794 sites that would have benefited from additional C2 funding.

To address this need, one of the ideas being discussed is to allow school and library systems with multiple locations the freedom to transfer their C2 budget balances between sites. This is called the consolidated budget approach. The logic goes something like this: If it is less expensive to add Wi-Fi in one building and there is a balance of available discounts than those funds can be applied to a Wi-Fi project at a different, more expensive site. Overall, this would free up millions of dollars of support and provide local decision makers additional freedom and flexibility to help schools and libraries that need support the most. Funds For Learning is a strong advocate for this approach and we think it is an absolute necessity.

But the consolidated budget system only addresses some of the inequities in the current C2 budget system, and it should not be implemented without other important changes, like increasing the budget calculation factors. A major drawback of the consolidated budget is that it helps school and library systems but does not provide any additional relief to individual applicants (i.e. applicants with a site count of one.) The more sites that an applicant has, the more flexibility the consolidated budget brings, and, ultimately, the more helpful it will be. As shown in the following chart, 52.6% of the current budget shortfall would be addressed by using consolidated budgets for applicants with 50 or more sites. Smaller applicants see a lower rate of support. For applicants with 2 to 4 sites, the consolidated budget system would address an estimated 31.4% of their current funding shortfall. And, of course, for single sites consolidated budgets would help 0%.

The following table shows the counts of applicants and sites impacted by the current Category Two budget shortfall. There is an estimated total five-year shortfall of $841.9 million, impacting 37,794 sites nationwide. 
The following table shows 29,768 sites would benefit from a consolidated budget system. On average, 42.2% of the budget shortfall would be address by this new approach; however, the additional support would be more heavily weighted towards larger applicants.  The dollar amounts are the total dollars needed over a five-year period.
Consolidated budgets will clearly play a big role in meeting the needs for Wi-Fi in schools and libraries. Helping close to 30,000 sites get the funding they need would be a significant step forward. The key is that the FCC recognize that the opportunities to improve the C2 system are multi-faceted, and therefore require a multi-faceted approach. Funds For Learning recommends that the FCC adopt consolidated budgets along with an increased budget floor of $30,000, a per student budget factor of at least $250, and a $6.00 per square foot budget factor for libraries. 
question icon

We’re here to help!

Our mission is to provide high-quality consulting and support services for the needs of E-rate program participants. We consult with applicants to help them understand, effectively utilize, and maintain compliance with E-rate rules and regulations. We help prepare and submit paperwork, and interact with program administrators on our clients’ behalf.

Request a Consultation